Blog & articles

Hello there, in the last blog, we discussed the fundamentals of test maintenance. Test maintenance is a vital, yet often overlooked, activity in any software development life cycle. There are many reasons why test cases need to be updated, including changes to the product, new features, and bug fixes. Software testers can perform test case management tasks, which is just as important as testing. Test maintenance helps qualify your software in its final stage.

Playwright and Cypress are two popular end-to-end testing frameworks used for web application testing. Playwright is a newer, open-source tool developed by Microsoft, while Cypress was developed as an open-source project and was introduced in 2014.

Testing unreleased software products can be a challenging task for any development team. These products are unique in that they have not yet been released to the public and therefore have not undergone real-world testing. In this article, we will outline some of the key challenges that teams may face when testing unreleased products and provide strategies for overcoming them.

Do you get tired of following strict scripts when testing software? Do you want to break free from the monotony of repetitive tasks and embrace the joy of discovering deep hidden treasures of information and bugs in your software? If so, then welcome to the world of Exploratory Testing, where the thrill of exploring the unknown combines with the art of software testing to raise your testing game to new heights. In this article, we are going to delve into the various activities, techniques, tools, and mindsets needed to learn the craft of exploratory testing.

What is Software Test Maintenance? Developers don’t usually talk about Software Test Maintenance unless something terrible happens. During our Software Testing Life Cycle (STLC) phases, we often speak phrases like, “It’s easy to maintain” and “It needs a lot of maintenance.” But we don’t take enough action from the start to make maintenance easy. We create a significant number of test cases as part of the testing process, and in this agile era, they must be updated often to keep up with the application’s behavior. We’ve all been there. It’s painfully uncomfortable, and it requires a lot of effort.

Successful projects are built on the foundation of precise requirements and the ability of teams to interpret, analyze, and review requirement documents. There are many customers who find it difficult to express their thoughts in words. Even if they are able to express themselves, there are many complexities that can arise due to the number of people involved, the skills of different team members, and the complexity of the domain. Without understanding the requirement documents (yes, there is a distinction between the requirements and the requirement documents), we would be on the path to making costly mistakes. Many projects suffered losses when the teams discovered the differences between intentions and implementation during the first demo.